Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
5.
Acad Med ; 95(12): 1834-1837, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733347

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions to the academic medicine community, including the cancellation of most medical and health professions conferences. In this Perspective, the authors examine both the short- and longer-term implications of these cancellations, including the effects on the professional development and advancement of junior faculty and learners. While the COVID-19 pandemic is new in 2020, impediments to conference attendance and participation are not. Cost, personal responsibilities at home, and clinical duties have always restricted attendance. The authors argue that the unprecedented hardships of this pandemic present a unique opportunity to reimagine how conferences can be conducted and to rethink what it means to be part of an academic community. While there are challenges with this digital transformation of academia, there are also undeniable opportunities: online abstracts and recorded presentations enable wider viewership, virtual sessions permit wider participation and greater interactivity, and the elimination of travel facilitates more diverse expert panel participation. The authors conclude with proposals for how conference organizers and participants can expand access by leveraging available distance learning technology and other virtual tools, both during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Congresses as Topic/trends , Education, Distance/trends , Education, Medical, Continuing/trends , Education, Medical/trends , Forecasting , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
World J Urol ; 39(6): 1997-2003, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-734101

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine how members of the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) are continuing their education in the time of COVID-19. METHODS: A survey was disseminated amongst SIU members worldwide by email. Results were analyzed to examine the influence of age, practice region and settings on continuing medical education (CME) of the respondents. RESULTS: In total, 2494 respondents completed the survey. Internet searching was the most common method of CME (76%; all ps < 0.001), followed by searching journals and textbook including the online versions (62%; all ps < 0.001). Overall, 6% of the respondents reported no time/interest for CME during the pandemic. Although most urologists report using only one platform for their CME (26.6%), the majority reported using ≥ 2 platforms, with approximately 10% of the respondents using up to 5 different platforms. Urologists < 40 years old were more likely to use online literature (69%), podcasts/AV media (38%), online CME courses/webinars (40%), and social media (39%). There were regional variations in the CME modality used but no significant difference in the number of methods by region. There was no significant difference in responses between urologists in academic/public hospitals or private practice. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19, urologists have used web-based learning for their CME. Internet learning and literature were the top frequently cited learning methods. Younger urologists are more likely to use all forms of digital learning methods, while older urologists prefer fewer methods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing , Teaching/trends , Urologists , Urology/education , Age Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Continuing/trends , Humans , Internationality , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Media , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urologists/education , Urologists/statistics & numerical data
8.
Postgrad Med J ; 96(1137): 384-386, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-260512

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. The disruption to hospital routines has affected continuing medical education (CME) for specialty trainees (STs). We share our academic institution's experience in mitigating the disruption on the CME programme amidst the pandemic. Most specialty training programmes had switched to videoconferencing to maintain teaching. Some programmes also utilized small group teachings with precautions and e-learning modules. Surgical residencies were disproportionately affected due to reductions in elective procedures but some ways to provide continued surgical exposure include going through archived surgical videos with technical pointers from experienced faculty and usage of surgical simulators . We should adapt CME sessions to keep trainees up to date with core clinical competencies as they will continue to manage both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases and this pandemic may last until year's end.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Continuing/trends , Medicine , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Emergency Medicine/education , Health Services Research , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/education , Organizational Innovation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Preventive Medicine/education , Psychiatry/education , Pulmonary Medicine/education , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL